Nº 003 — Rankings

Smallest Olympus lenses

11 Olympus lenses, every mount included, ranked by length, weight or diameter, on the maker's official dimensions. Shortest: Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/2.8.

AOlympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/2.8 2009Micro Four Thirds · MFT

BOlympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 2012Micro Four Thirds · MFT

COlympus M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.8 2014Micro Four Thirds · MFT

The smallest with a traced drawing, to scale. Open in the compare tool →

#	Lens	35mm eq.	Ø × length	Weight	Compare
1	A Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/2.8 2009MFT	≈ 34mm eq.	Ø57 × 22 mm	71 g	Compare
2	B Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f/1.8 2012MFT	≈ 34mm eq.	Ø57.5 × 35.5 mm	120 g	Compare
3	C Olympus M.Zuiko 25mm f/1.8 2014MFT	≈ 50mm eq.	Ø57.8 × 42 mm	137 g	Compare
4	Olympus M.Zuiko 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 2009MFT · retracted length	≈ 28–84mm eq.	Ø62 × 43.5 mm	150 g	Compare
5	Olympus M.Zuiko 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II 2010MFT · retracted length	≈ 28–84mm eq.	Ø56.5 × 50 mm	112 g	Compare
6	Olympus M.Zuiko 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II R 2011MFT · retracted length	≈ 28–84mm eq.	Ø56.5 × 50 mm	113 g	Compare
7	Olympus M.Zuiko 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 EZ 2012MFT	≈ 24–100mm eq.	Ø57 × 83 mm	212 g	Compare
8	Olympus M.Zuiko 14-150mm f/4-5.6 2010MFT	≈ 28–300mm eq.	Ø63.5 × 83 mm	260 g	Compare
9	Olympus M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4-5.6 2010MFT	≈ 80–300mm eq.	Ø63.5 × 83 mm	190 g	Compare
10	Olympus M.Zuiko 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 2011MFT	≈ 150–600mm eq.	Ø70 × 116 mm	430 g	Compare
11	Olympus M.Zuiko 100-400mm f/5-6.3 IS 2020MFT	≈ 200–800mm eq.	Ø86.4 × 205.7 mm	1120 g	Compare

Ranked on the maker's official dimensions, except box volume = width × height × the depth as drawn (the official depth when there is no top view). 10 of 11 have a traced drawing; the others open in the compare tool as a box of their official size.