Nº 003 — Rankings

Smallest Hasselblad XCD lenses

25 Hasselblad XCD lenses ranked by length, weight or diameter, on the maker's official dimensions. Shortest: Hasselblad XCD 28mm f/4 P.

AHasselblad XCD 45mm f/4 P 2020Hasselblad XCD · MF

BHasselblad XCD 38mm f/2.5 V 2022Hasselblad XCD · MF

CHasselblad XCD 55mm f/2.5 V 2022Hasselblad XCD · MF

The smallest with a traced drawing, to scale. Open in the compare tool →

#	Lens	35mm eq.	Ø × length	Weight	Compare
1	Hasselblad XCD 28mm f/4 P 2023MF	≈ 22mm eq.	Ø75 × 43.5 mm	245 g	Compare
2	A Hasselblad XCD 45mm f/4 P 2020MF	≈ 36mm eq.	Ø80 × 47 mm	320 g	Compare
3	B Hasselblad XCD 38mm f/2.5 V 2022MF	≈ 30mm eq.	Ø76 × 63 mm	350 g	Compare
4	C Hasselblad XCD 55mm f/2.5 V 2022MF	≈ 43mm eq.	Ø76 × 67 mm	372 g	Compare
5	Hasselblad XCD 45mm f/3.5 2016MF	≈ 36mm eq.	Ø76 × 70 mm	417 g	Compare
6	Hasselblad XCD 75mm f/3.4 P 2024MF	≈ 59mm eq.	Ø75 × 71 mm	398 g	Compare
7	Laowa 19mm f/2.8 Zero-D (XCD) 2024MF	≈ 15mm eq.	Ø82.6 × 80 mm	546 g	Compare
8	Hasselblad XCD 30mm f/3.5 2016MF	≈ 24mm eq.	Ø83 × 83 mm	550 g	Compare
9	SG-image MF 75mm f/1.2 (XCD) 2026MF	≈ 59mm eq.	Ø77 × 83 mm	642 g	Compare
10	Hasselblad XCD 90mm f/2.5 V 2022MF	≈ 71mm eq.	Ø75 × 90 mm	551 g	Compare
11	Laowa 20mm f/4 Zero-D Shift (XCD) 2022FF	≈ 20mm eq.	Ø95 × 91 mm	747 g	Compare
12	Hasselblad XCD 65mm f/2.8 2017MF	≈ 51mm eq.	Ø81 × 93 mm	727 g	Compare
13	Hasselblad XCD 90mm f/3.2 2016MF	≈ 71mm eq.	Ø77 × 95 mm	619 g	Compare
14	TTArtisan 90mm f/1.25 (XCD) 2021FF	≈ 90mm eq.	Ø82 × 98 mm	1055 g	Compare
15	Hasselblad XCD 25mm f/2.5 V 2024MF	≈ 20mm eq.	Ø75 × 100 mm	592 g	Compare
16	Hasselblad XCD 21mm f/4 2018MF	≈ 17mm eq.	Ø83 × 101 mm	600 g	Compare
17	Laowa 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift (XCD) 2020FF	≈ 15mm eq.	Ø79 × 103 mm	597 g	Compare
18	Laowa 17mm f/4 Zero-D Tilt-Shift (XCD) 2026FF	≈ 17mm eq.	Ø93 × 111 mm	810 g	Compare
19	Hasselblad XCD 20-35mm f/3.2-4.5 E 2024MF	≈ 16–28mm eq.	Ø81 × 112 mm	805 g	Compare
20	Hasselblad XCD 80mm f/1.9 2018MF	≈ 63mm eq.	Ø84 × 112 mm	1044 g	Compare
21	Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E 2025MF	≈ 28–79mm eq.	Ø90 × 133 mm	894 g	Compare
22	Hasselblad XCD 135mm f/2.8 2018MF	≈ 107mm eq.	Ø81 × 144 mm	935 g	Compare
23	Hasselblad XCD 120mm f/3.5 Macro 2017MF	≈ 95mm eq.	Ø81 × 145 mm	970 g	Compare
24	Hasselblad XCD 35-75mm f/3.5-4.5 2017MF	≈ 28–59mm eq.	Ø85 × 145 mm	1115 g	Compare
25	Laowa 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5x Macro (XCD) 2025FF	≈ 35mm eq.	Ø104.9 × 148.9 mm	1350 g	Compare

Ranked on the maker's official dimensions, except box volume = width × height × the depth as drawn (the official depth when there is no top view). 22 of 25 have a traced drawing; the others open in the compare tool as a box of their official size.